Statement on Behalf of John Eastman Regarding United States v. Donald J. Trump Indictment

Almost fifteen years ago, John Eastman defense counsel Harvey Silverglate predicted in the book Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent that the ever expanding federal criminal code was liable to be misused for improper political purposes.
 
This prediction finds its fulfillment in the current administration’s use of heretofore obscure federal statutes to indict its leading political opponent in multiple jurisdictions.
  
The latest indictment relies on a misleading presentation of the record to contrive criminal charges against Presidential candidate Trump and to cast ominous aspersions on his close advisors.
 
For example, the uninitiated reader of the indictment would have no idea that former Vice President Pence is on record stating that in the 2020 election there were “significant allegations of voting irregularities and numerous instances of officials setting aside state election law.”  This is but one example of the indictment’s false presentation of the record; countless more will be revealed in time.
 
With respect to questions as to whether Dr. Eastman is involved in plea bargaining, the answer is no. But if he were invited to plea bargain with either state or federal prosecutors, he would decline. The fact is, if Dr. Eastman is indicted, he will go to trial. If convicted, he will appeal. The Eastman legal team is confident of its legal position in this matter.
 
 
 
Related Posts

Understanding OFAC Sanctions and the Consequences of Evasion

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is responsible for enforcing U.S. economic and trade sanctions against individuals, businesses, and foreign entities that pose a threat to national security or violate U.S. laws. Sanctions are designed to restrict financial and commercial transactions with targeted parties.  Federal prosecutors charge individuals and businesses based on allegations that they have

Read This

Federal Charges Dismissed with Prejudice: Justice Prevails for Akbar Masood

For nearly three years, the government denied our client, Akbar Masood, access to the evidence he needed to defend himself while simultaneously violating his right to a speedy trial. Despite these egregious delays and due process violations, the prosecution persisted in its baseless pursuit of charges against him. Yesterday in the United States District Court

Read This

Defending Your Rights
In Federal Court

Contact us Now

What Our Clients Have To say...