Statement on Behalf of Jeffrey Clark Regarding January 6th Committee Final Report

The January 6 Committee has been a political and public-relations bust. This is why, on its way out the door, the Committee is desperately trying to make a splash with criminal referrals it was obvious from the very start its members were going to make in an effort to try to destroy their conservative political opponents.

The Committee was a carefully crafted hit squad with members hand-selected by Speaker Pelosi. 99% of its proceedings were secret depositions akin to a Star Chamber. The rights of the Republican minority to participate were stripped and no minority or witness counsel were allowed to cross-examine the witnesses—mocking due process.

Worse yet, the Committee’s entire focus was on relitigating something one wing of Congress had already litigated and lost—former President Trump’s second impeachment trial. The Committee simply refused to accept the acquittal in the Senate and walk away.

The one aspect of the Committee’s work that might actually have been useful—the research of the “Blue Team” into the law enforcement and intelligence community’s failure to protect the Capitol—was jettisoned from the final report (demoted to a mere appendix) at Vice Chair Cheney’s insistence in favor of strictly political content.

The Committee’s last gasp is anticlimactic. The important point is that this is its last gasp; this Committee is now largely dead and will be fully dead on January 2, 2023.

On January 3, 2023, the new House should begin investigating the massive and unexplained intelligence and security perimeter failures that led to a group of rioters bursting into the Capitol.

Related Posts

Defending Attorneys Before the DC Board of Professional Responsibility: Understanding Its Role in Attorney Discipline Cases

Defending Attorneys Before the DC Board of Professional Responsibility: Understanding Its Role in Attorney Discipline Cases The DC Board of Professional Responsibility plays a crucial role in regulating the ethical conduct of attorneys practicing in Washington, DC. When an attorney faces disciplinary action due to alleged ethical violations, the board investigates complaints, conducts hearings, and

Read This

White-Collar Crime: Federal Investigations and Common Defenses

White-collar crime encompasses a range of non-violent offenses often involving deception, fraud, or breaches of trust to achieve financial gain. Federal prosecutors aggressively pursue white-collar cases, and individuals accused of these crimes face severe penalties, including imprisonment and significant fines. Understanding the nature of white-collar crime, the federal investigative process, and potential defense strategies is crucial

Read This

Defending Your Rights
In Federal Court

Contact us Now

What Our Clients Have To say...

Top