John Eastman Statement Upon Self-Surrender in Fulton County

I am here today to surrender to an indictment that should never have been brought.  It represents a crossing of the Rubicon for our country, implicating the fundamental First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances.  As troubling, it targets attorneys for their zealous advocacy on behalf of their clients, something attorneys are ethically bound to provide and which was attempted here by “formally challeng[ing] the results of the election through lawful and appropriate means.”  – An opportunity never afforded them in the Fulton County Superior Court.

Each Defendant in this indictment, no less than any other American citizen, is entitled to rely upon the advice of counsel and the benefit of past legal precedent in challenging what former Vice President Pence described as, “serious allegations of voting irregularities and numerous instances of officials setting aside state election law” in the 2020 election.  The attempt to criminalize our rights to such redress with this indictment will have – and is already having – profound consequences for our system of justice.

My legal team and I will vigorously contest every count of the indictment in which I am named, and also every count in which others are named, for which my knowledge of the relevant facts, law, and constitutional provisions may prove helpful.  I am confident that, when the law is faithfully applied in this proceeding, all of my co-defendants and I will be fully vindicated.

Related Posts

Anti-Stalking Orders in DC Superior Court

A protective order is an order from a court preventing one person from having contact with another. In Washington, DC, the Superior Court is authorized to issue a special kind of protective order called an Anti-Stalking order. This article gives some basic facts about anti-stalking orders you will want to know if you are seeking

Read This

Resisting Federal Debarment Actions

“Debarment” is a formal action by the federal government that excludes a person or company from receiving government contracts or grants for a specified period. It is a more severe sanction than a “suspension” and can completely shut down a federal contractor’s business for a period of time. Debarment proceedings are governed by the Federal

Read This

Defending Your Rights
In Federal Court

Contact us Now

What Our Clients Have To say...

Top